Gao Fu, director of the China CDC (good friend of W. Ian Lipkin): (Chinese vaccines) don’t have very high protection rates. It’s now under formal consideration whether we should use different vaccines from different technical lines for the immunisation process.

Aljazeera: The effectiveness rate of a coronavirus vaccine from Sinovac, a Chinese developer, at preventing symptomatic infections has been found to be as low as 50.4 percent by researchers in Brazil.

Which puts it on a similar level to AstraZeneca. This is another case of an experimental drug being given to millions of people - even though it's known to be ineffective. That's classic Vaccine Data Wars - it's not about the effectiveness, it's about the information war.

China is now considering a cocktail approach to vaccines, as are "Researchers in Britain (who) are studying a possible combination of the Pfizer-BioNTech and AstraZeneca vaccines."

This sounds like a reckless double-or-nothing gamble. Where are the studies that test the safety of the cocktail approach? There are none.

The good news is that with all these useless vaccines piling up then we will have plenty of 'vaccines' to sell to third world countries at discount prices!

Interestingly, China has only fully-vaccinated 34 million. For a country that tested 11 million people in Wuhan in a few days, that seems like a piddling amount. This suggests they've known for a while that Sinovac is useless, and or has dangerous side-effects.