It’s a good question. Hard to know the answer - coz it’s a spy organization. The stock answer, same as the scientists', is: no politics - we are above politics. But in light of the Mueller-led 7-year bungled/cover-up investigation into Anthrax's origin - and the convenient 'non-decision' of US Intelligence re Covid's origin, it demands examination.

First principle of Covid: ‘no evidence’ - is a kind of evidence. It’s evidence that the truth is being concealed. We have to keep remembering - for us it’s a big mystery - but it’s not for the ‘actors’.

So what do we know about the politics of your typical National Security Organization? This is an exercise in stating the obvious - but hopefully worth it:

• It’s a public service career job. They are un-elected. They watch politicians ‘cycle’ through. (Robert Mueller the 3rd’s reign, for example, ran since he was appointed head of the FBI in July 2001.)
  
• Pay is good. Great at the top. Massive budget. This money comes from our taxes.
  
• It’s mission is to guard National Security - identify/combat threats - to maintain/expand the established power structure - the Order.
  
• It’s an international network of spies.
  
• It is predisposed to international data collection, centralization and surveillance.
  
• It’s powerful.
  
• It requires alliances with powerful international monied organizations - private and government, including bio-defense/weapons research organizations - whilst keeping tabs on/back-channeling with the rest.
  
• It’s global by nature.
  
• National Security/Order entails a concept of the ‘common-good’. It’s actors are dedicated to uphold that.
  
• It can’t divulge details of its operations to protect this common-good - or even define what the 'common-good' means - due to National Security.

This last one is the fundamental Catch-22 politics that lies at the heart of every National Security organization:

We are empowered to act covertly to secure the ‘common-good’.

FAQ:
This section has been closed due to the common good. Thank you.

That’s a guaranteed recipe for corruption. It’s unaccountable surveillance power politics - gone mad. Got a rocket launch with 911 - a booster with SARS - then a super-booster shot with Covid. Several of our Celebrity Actors have risen to fame on those events - are still calling the shots today.

Suddenly our lives are governed by global security operations. People are fined, jailed, ostracized, vilified for non-compliance. There has been a melding of security organizations and powerful science bodies such as Wellcome - joined at the hip by their concept of Oneness.

We know it’s all due to Covid - but we’re not allowed to know what Covid was due to? Why? Due to security restrictions - due to Covid.

So here’s the question:

What happens if those at the top of these organizations come to the conclusion that totalitarianism really is the best system of government - in a global world - for the common good? To save the planet from the perils of democratic anti-globalist/anti-the science populism ... ? Or the ‘existential threat’ of Climate Change … ?

If all of that is at stake (in your head) - are you not the world leaders charged with protecting us? Saving the planet? Do you not have a sacred duty to do whatever it takes?

If not now, when…? If not us, whom…?

The point is: the politics of security organizations exists. It’s active, has goals, is global, forms alliances with like-minded powers, including organizations like Wellcome - more specifically the leaders of these forces.

We've discussed the influence of the United Front Work Department - the tendency is to think all these academics/power elites were hood-winked by the Chinese - but it’s more a meeting-of-minds. The Big Boys making Big Decisions. With a One-Everything ideological overlap.