Exploring the 'Organization as a GODS' angle, security organizations tick all the boxes. It's important to remember that although they seem like faceless organizations, machine-like even, with no-one to hold accountable exactly, there are still real people calling the shots. They're not held accountable, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. They exist fine.

Researching/writing The Covid Atrocity, i delved into several of the main characters involved in:
engineering the virus
releasing it upon the public (on purpose or accidentally)
orchestrating the closed-ranks cover-up

They were all people with names, hiding in the plain-sight of Expert World.

It also became apparent that security people played a major part in the above three events. A lot of cross-over into security world - that way of thinking. The thing about that thinking, you get so far out there, there's no coming back. The crimes you've committed are too heinous. But if you're good enough, you never have to worry about being caught. It's all an image world game. Doesn't matter what you've done, the truth doesn't matter. Only thing that matters is you continue to project your image positively ... If you do that, you win, you feel happy, knowing you're a big-winner in the great game of life. So big you control it.

Apart from all the usual state security orgs, there are:
a bunch of private ones (such as UK firm Hakluyt, involved in the Bo Xilai happenings) - compiled of top ex-govt security people
Global Health Security orgs -including B&M Gates Wellcome Trust/Oxford which present an image as global health security research operations.

The common denominator is that they all claim an inalienable right to operate in secret &/or lie about their operations in the name of some secret goal that the public are not privy to - despite funding most of their work. The three groups are, not surprisingly, interconnected operationally - Wellcome for example has heads of private security orgs (Hakluyt) as well as an ex-MI5 head on its board.

They also all operate as deep-state power hubs beyond the reach of democracy or accountability & have tightly controlled lines of succession. Those in the top jobs will typically be in power their entire working lives.

Bottom-line: if you operate as a security org higher-up, you do whatever the fuck you want with no oversight, no personal repercussions - no bad ones anyway - plenty of good ones.

We've discussed before about the public occasionally being thrown a sacrificial lamb like Bruce Ivins (Anthrax - 7 yrs after the event following a long, expensive cover-up operation by Robert Mueller/FBI) or Oswald - i don't think there's ever been an example of a security org person ever being charged with anything in terms of covering-up. Far more likely to be charged with uncovering, like poor old Snowden - but that was only coz he was a whistle-blower. That's key, security players see it as their job to cover-up information/spread disinformation. That's why it's called secret security

That kind of set-up is a guaranteed way to breed an entrenched culture of corruption. Especially when you have the power to ensure that it stays that way.

Which leaves us with immensely powerful organizations actively shaping world reality - derailing it in fact - hijacking it & replacing it with a fake reality - a flat-earth reality - with no-one left to stop them.

The only way out of this mess is a drastic reformation of security orgs. How much of the work they do really needs to be secret? I would argue almost none of it. It's not valid to argue, as such people do, in the cases of the Kennedy assassination or Covid, that oh, we can't tell the real truth coz that would be too de-stabilizing for world-order (which we control)!

The philosophers will tell you a self-appointed secret license to lie does not hold up logically as a guiding principle. Whatever you do after that, doesn't matter, if your premise is wrong, it's fruit of the poison tree.

But i can't see such an overhaul ever happening. These groups (GODS) have simply become too powerful to let that happen. 100% certain they will never do it themselves & they have the power to crush whoever might try to hold these influence empire people accountable.

That only leaves a kind of mass-DIY de-centralization movement. Where more & more people choose to opt out - turn their backs on the system.

This is the system's weak-point - it relies on the compliance of the masses. It's a kind of paradox - even as it de-influences the individual, it still needs all these individuals in order to maintain its own influence/established order. If that can be eroded over time, then that represents our best shot of breaking free of this tyranny.

If it was not already a big enough insult to victims that Pell's life is being celebrated with a grandiose funeral, now the cops are cracking down on anyone wishing to protest this travesty.

Police spokesperson: The NSW Police Force has received a Form 1 for a protest planned for Thursday 2 February in Sydney CBD, however, despite attempted negotiations with organisers, safety concerns associated with their proposed assembly cannot be adequately mitigated without amendments to the proposal.

As such, the Commissioner will apply to the NSW Supreme Court to prohibit the assembly.

(Police) recognise and support the rights of individuals and groups to exercise their rights of free speech and peaceful assembly, however, the first priority is always the safety of the wider community.

The old 'to keep us safe' BS that gets trotted out every single time authorities want to clamp down on basic human rights.

Hard to imagine a more flagrant example of that than the above. As pointed out in the earlier post, Pell continuously used his position of immense power to enable child-sexual abuse then cover it up. Then block victims from seeking compensation through his concoction of the Ellis Defense (arguing THE Church is not a legal entity, therefore not liable). Pell was the integral force in Australia responsible for masterminding all three types of abuses (enabling, covering-up, blocking compensation) against children.

This abuse included the Catholic Ballarat diocese (in which Pell was a leading figure) leaning on police to drop their investigation against Father Day (which they did) and arranging for prolific pedophile, Father Ridsdale, to be shuffled from parish to parish to continue his sexual-abuse spree.

The Royal Commission found, unequivocally, that Pell was aware of rampant abuse & sought to cover it up.

So when the safety of children being sexually abused was on the line, the police, directed by the Ballarat diocese, enabled the abusers. But now, suddenly, when people want to protest this flagrant abuse of power, they're banned from doing so due to the safety of the wider community?

How the fuck does protesting a leading child-sexual abuser/enabler constitute a threat to the safety of the wider community?

I think we know the answer. Anything that may lead to a questioning of the ruling order is a threat to the safety of the elite's power-base.

To date, not one person has been convicted in Australia for the crime of concealment of child sexual abuse - even though there is a specific law defining it as a crime.

We also know why that is. Despite truckloads upon truckloads of evidence that Pell did conceal abuse - if you're a power-elite, the rules don't apply. It's that simple.

It's no coincidence that the media's current target for vilification (in Aus at least) is the growing number of individuals choosing to withdraw from the system & rejecting this gas-lighting by the higher-ups & their farcical laws. At least the media's sensitivity to this movement shows that they recognize it as their major weakness.