This disclaimer is appearing at the bottom of these AP stories:

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education.

It didn't take long to find this page:

The Associated Press and Howard Hughes Medical Institute Expand Collaboration to Bolster Health and Science Coverage

Designed to allow for deeper audience engagement and development, the multiformat health and science projects will also be used to establish best practices for science storytelling.

There's so much crazy shit in these posts, i don't know where to start, but the phrase science storytelling is as good as any. As you point out, it's not the real truth coz the headline implies, wrongly, that they're experimenting on cadavers, when in fact they're technically alive. It's based on the unshakeable belief by scientists that they're always right - which frees you up to tell whatever lies you like, do whatever unethical stuff you like, coz you know, on a higher-level, that you're right.

It also helps explain the inexplicable refusal by the media to report on the scandal of the millennium that was Covid. The media normally loves scandals - i couldn't understand why they were resolutely shutting down any investigative reporting on it. But as you've documented, it turns out that media organizations and research organizations are often the same thing.

The Guardian is another good example - the majority of the board is from Oxford - which in turn was one of the academic institutions that was the most pro-active in covering-up the origin of Covid.

This behaviour is not that far removed from the organ harvesting of live Falun Gong members. You wouldn't have to get all the way to The Refuser to see a day when the 'dead' definition comes to include prisoners on death row - or even political prisoners. The rationale would be: Well, they're dead to society - let's put them to some use!