<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Formosahut forum - War 2026</title>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/</link>
<description>Living in Taiwan</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>War 2026 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, i&#039;ve been distracted by other matters lately, but that is a Formosa Hut <em>Hall-of-Fame</em> fucking post.</p>
<p>It distills the situation we&#039;re in.  It&#039;s called <em>reality</em>, but it&#039;s not.</p>
<blockquote><p>A few thoughts about war in 2026</p>
<p>We are already in an unconventional world war, unconventional because it isn&#039;t a cold war in the historic sense. It&#039;s a very hot war, it&#039;s just not being fought with conventional weapons and tactics -- planes, bombs, boots on the ground, etc. </p>
</blockquote><p>Right on.  It&#039;s a cyber-war.  Where AI-powered drones are the next break-through weapon. Electricity, Internet are the targets.  Whoever controls that space controls the world. </p>
<blockquote><p>How often now do you read of a major bank or credit company or health insurer getting their data hacked?</p>
</blockquote><p>
Often.  Actually less n less these days.  So long as these banks, insurance companies, etc have got your data, then losing it ... is not <em>good </em>... but it&#039;s not a total disaster.  <br />
You&#039;ve still got the data.  Data is the currency. I doubt they give a shit.</p>
<p>A total disaster would be if they lost access to it entirely, which is theoretically possible. <br />
Would involve knocking out their back-up, but theoretically doable with a few well-placed drones.  <br />
That would pique their interest.  What&#039;s the text message for that:  Due to an unprecedented outage, all your money is gone. Is there anything else we can help you with today?</p>
<blockquote><p>I don&#039;t even pay attention anymore. The records of hundreds of millions of people stolen in a single hit. What&#039;s happening? Is that warfare? I think sometimes, certainly. Airlines get grounded due to &#039;computer glitches&#039; and such. Entire airlines.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/united-airlines-flights-grounded-nationwide-connectivity-issue-rcna233357">United Airlines flights grounded nationwide for 30 minutes due to &#039;connectivity issue&#039;</a></p>
</blockquote><p>
It&#039;s <em>warfare </em>alright.  Data-war.  Orwell - Huxley&#039;s well-reasoned <em>Big War</em>: the War on individuality/free thinking  (one of Formosa Hut&#039;s topics for many years).  </p>
<p>This feels like the bit where all individuality gets hoovered up by the ORG-GODS. <br />
Which, theoretically, will result in the collapse of existence, if the goal of uniting all thought as one is achieved.  <br />
Without (critical) Observation, you ain&#039;t got jack-shit.  The Big Implosion.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Right now I think we&#039;re in a skirmishing phase. What happens if it escalates to all out warfare in this new theater? Electric grids out? Engineered information that causes panic about the food safety or supply? </p>
</blockquote><p>
Can tell you for a fact, <em>The Aussies</em> would be fucked.  The electric &amp; internet grids could not be more exposed/fragile.  You wouldn&#039;t even need your cyber warfare - sneeze violently in their direction it would collapse.</p>
<blockquote><p>And here&#039;s the thing - for a geographically large country like the US or Australia or China, this new type of war is more disruptive to the average person than a conventional war. Why wage conventional war when you can do more damage with this new, improved approach? </p>
<p>The new normal: <a href="https://www.particle6.com/">https://www.particle6.com/</a></p>
</blockquote><p>A key point from your post is that it&#039;s an obvious war going on, involving game-changing weapons, that&#039;s not been declared as a war.  </p>
<p>It goes on in the secret realm of intelligence agencies/govs playing games, though the impacts of it are being felt increasingly by normal mushroom people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=4497</link>
<guid>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=4497</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 09:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dulan drift</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>War 2026 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few thoughts about war in 2026</p>
<p>We are already in an unconventional world war, unconventional because it isn&#039;t a cold war in the historic sense. It&#039;s a very hot war, it&#039;s just not being fought with conventional weapons and tactics -- planes, bombs, boots on the ground, etc. </p>
<p>How often now do you read of a major bank or credit company or health insurer getting their data hacked? I don&#039;t even pay attention anymore. The records of hundreds of millions of people stolen in a single hit. What&#039;s happening? Is that warfare? I think sometimes, certainly. Airlines get grounded due to &#039;computer glitches&#039; and such. Entire airlines.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/united-airlines-flights-grounded-nationwide-connectivity-issue-rcna233357">United Airlines flights grounded nationwide for 30 minutes due to &#039;connectivity issue&#039;</a></p>
<p>Right now I think we&#039;re in a skirmishing phase. What happens if it escalates to all out warfare in this new theater? Electric grids out? Engineered information that causes panic about the food safety or supply? </p>
<p>And here&#039;s the thing - for a geographically large country like the US or Australia or China, this new type of war is more disruptive to the average person than a conventional war. Why wage conventional war when you can do more damage with this new, improved approach? </p>
<p>The new normal: <a href="https://www.particle6.com/">https://www.particle6.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=4492</link>
<guid>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=4492</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 01:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Synthetics</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This event probably won&#039;t get much attention in the big wide world of all the shit that is happening today, but it strikes me as an important milestone. So, does this mean the term <em>synthetics</em> will become a household word to refer to AI generated people? This is straight out of Dark Mirror. </p>
<p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/hollywood-performers-union-condemns-ai-generated-actress-tilly-norwood-2025-10-01/">Hollywood performers union condemns AI-generated &#039;actress&#039; Tilly Norwood</a></p>
<p>LOS ANGELES, Sept 30 (Reuters) - The recent debut of an AI-generated &quot;actress&quot; dubbed Tilly Norwood, and its producer&#039;s boasts of interest from studio executives, sparked a backlash on Tuesday from the SAG-AFTRA actors union, condemning the replacement of human performers with <strong>&quot;synthetics.&quot;</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=4491</link>
<guid>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=4491</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 21:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
