But on the other hand...

1. He worked with autonomous weapons, if memory serves (won't try to find everything again just now), so he'd know a bit about drones.

2. Stuff in the truck was so badly burned it couldn't be immediately identified, including his body. Even the rifle he took was torched. And yet they managed to retrieve his military ID and passport in very good condition.

3. The media has fixated on a girlfriend he had years before, a nurse who apparently loves the camera and sharing how mentally unstable he was. Yet nothing from his wife.

4. The whole drone series of events in the US Northeast has been very odd. Various feds will tell us it's just normal activity, then have classified meetings on the issue. That doesn't add up.

And now, poof, it's gone. It never happened. Not a peep in the media about it.

I'm into breaking stuff down to things we know. In this case we know:

Matthew Livelsberger wasn't an Arabian terrorist (linked to Bourbon St incident). He was a crack soldier/patriot - Trump supporter - with expertise in military drones.

He did write the manifesto. Doesn't make the things he said facts, that we don't know yet, but it's a fact that he wrote it. The central points were:

1. China & US have gravitical propulsion, which he connected to the US NE drone event. Could it be the disclosure was not about ufos exactly, more about disclosing the leap-forward in drone anti-gravitational propulsion tech ... ? (This would fit well with the tennis-ball-inverted-theory, no?)

2. War crimes were committed by US military higher-ups in Afghanistan ... then covered-up.

There was a big war crimes case in Aus a couple of years ago - a celebrity-hero-soldier/politician, who ran a frontline squad, went rogue , started shooting civilians in fits of pique.
So war crimes happened, but this is different. It's Julian Assange level. It involves testimony that top-level management executed war crimes ... in this case via deliberate drone attacks.
That's the movie that doesn't end with the frontline rogue guy - it goes all the way to the top - wherever that is ... & i think that's the point ... no-one is accountable coz the machine dunnit.

3. The FBI or Homeland were onto him.

As you would be. They'd be dumber than i thought if they weren't - an active military malcontent ... with top-secret knowledge. They'd be tracking their personal up their ga-zoos - surely you'd be tracking that guy.
His testimony could/probably will be explained as ptsd induced paranoia. Livelsberger likely had that as an input - killing people for a living is liable to kick-back on you, psychologically.
But it's not an auto-dismissal for what he documented either, as an insider.
In reality, you're not gonna hear of that kinda raw information from an insider, unless the experience of accumulating it has messed them up in some way. There's no other kind.

4. The manifesto was instantly flagged/de-platformed by MSM's algorithms.
Normally they'd leap all over those kinda sordid details of a lone-nut killer - so that's notable in itself. It means there's something in what he said which is deemed not suitable for maintaining community standards.

5. It was more of a dramatic self-immolation than a terrorist attack. He was pro-Trump - therefore deducably pro-Musk - sounds like, in his mind, he was trying to send a grand wake-up call targeted at those two - rather than cause mass civilian fatalities.

The implications, like the cyber-truck, are mind-blowing, but also unsurprising. I'm leaning towards the tic-tac ufos being what Livelsberger was talking about.
Which puts us on a new nuclear-war-threat-status. If you think about it, graviatic/anti-gravity propulsion is the next/inevitable extension of war-tech - it's a game-changer.
Which instantly makes me auto-suspicious of the point of the exercise. These things always seem to end up with a human-rights-shrinking-effect.

The guy who supposedly blew himself up in a Tesla in front of the Trump Tower in LV sent an Email to another guy in which he discusses drones using the same anti-gravity technology that Greer mentioned in the Dec. 20 interview.

Sam Shoemate - Cybertruck Bomber Matt Livelsberger’s Email Reveals NEW Evidence

I'll attach a screenshot of a portion of the Email, but I highly recommend just listening to the interview.

In the email, the (supposedly) dead dude includes a pin to the location of one of the bases for these machines. Here are the coordinates:

37.2475372 -115.8155235 (from his pin screenshot)
37°14'51.1"N 115°48'55.9"W (how Google Maps spits it out)

Check that location out. Very interesting.

Was this the guy who Greer was referring to? Or one of a group?

According to a recent podcasts featuring Steven Greer, the drones are ours, the product of a secret, illegal, and decades long black op, and the reason for them is to wage a fake alien invasion as a way to scare the public into accepting authoritarianism.

That all sounds over the top, but after covid, it makes some sense.

That's the thing about Covid that the cover-upers, in their arrogance, didn't calculate. Nobody is ever gonna believe you again. Well not nobody, but less & less.

It's recorded proof that those who wield big-power are prepared to do absolutely anything to protect/increase their power. Nothing is sacred. Not truth, not life, honour, nothing. It's all a Plato's Cave projection to maintain established order. That's the only guiding principle.

As i tried (but failed) to explain to a top-ranked scientist i know: if you're goal is to fan the flames of the very thing you fear the most, you're going about it in exactly the right way

Re the black-op, although i think drones & aliens are the same thing, a less grandiose explanation might be to create more military regulation for drone operations.

With all the money spent on nuclear bombs, drones (relatively cheap (as is biowarfare)) are clearly a huge part of modern conflict. Especially when there's an out-gunned adversary involved, including a domestic one. Drones are something that can be weaponized by non-state actors without a state-sized budget. They would give you the willies if you were a DoD higher-up.

If it was me, in the black-op team's shoes, (& i had no moral compunction, Covid-style), i'd stage a drone terrorist attack. It's worked before - don't need to reinvent the wheel. Then you'd have carte blanche to regulate/monopolize drones - bring it all under your control - stay ahead of the game. To keep people safe.

Coincidentally, below is a photo sent to me by a different Dan, that sums the above up:

That all sounds over the top, but after covid, it makes some sense.

There is way too much secrecy/lying going on in the (public funded) upper echelons. Almost none of it is for our benefit (though we're invariably told it is to keep us safe) - it's always to protect the orgs that manage the established order.

As you point out, if a top airbase is closed down, that's significant, & there's obviously a reason why. There are only really two possibilites:

1. They genuinely don't know what's going on (though know something is happening)

2. There is an actual threat

Either way, it's a problem that the public deserves to be informed about. If they're not, it only invites conjecture. It seems that howling anyone down asking questions as a conspiracy theorist (which worked incredibly well during Covid) is starting to wear thin.

Wright Patterson is a major US AFB. It's not some backwater base. It's one of the major bases in the US.

And so for the govt. to downplay this is absurd. There's something going on, and either they won't tell us what it is or they don't know. And here's the thing. For the amount of OUR MONEY we give the DoD, you'd think we'd get better answers. I mean, if this is what we get for our investment, I'd rather it be put into health care.

That's interesting in itself. If we're talking 'master-crime' then drones seem to be the way of the future. Forget about the prosthetic make-up - just pilot in an armed-drone - they won't know how to trace it. Especially if it explodes.

I'd be surprised if it was China or the other touted state-acting suspects - why would you telegraph your capability without actually doing anything?

It could be an internal psy-op aimed at ramping up trackability of drones by private owners. It's long been known that drones are a key component of any modern war. If they currently have no way to identify recreational-use from enemy attack, you could imagine they'd want the power to determine that. Whether that's good or bad, i don't know, only saying it's what i would be doing if i were the CIA org

(A)lthough he was a elite private school valedictorian, ivy league graduate, and had a very active social media profile, nobody from his past ID'd him. How can that be?

And yet a burger flipper at a McDonald's recognized him?

Good point, why the heck didn't anyone who actually knew him ID him?

Whatever, he was captured alive. There will be a trial. Unless he mysteriously suicides in jail, there's still a lot to play out as global theatre.

Apparently it wasn't a mask. Though our reasoning was fairly sound & it will likely become a thing of the future. We might be master criminals ahead of our time.

Yes, I think we have at least come up with a very good premise for the perfect crime novel.

What remains to be seen, & you almost get the feeling that the game is willing it to happen, is will there be a copycat CEO Killing?

I've been wondering how the corporatocracy will try to defuse any broad movement behind this guy, and it looks like they're doing it by labeling him some sicko far leftist, when in reality, of course, the health care disaster in the US effects most everyone.

And yet a burger flipper at a McDonald's recognized him?

Talking about things being a bit too perfect, what are the odds of a McDonald's worker id-ing him a week later, & he still happens to be in possession of writings & a ghost gun (whatever that is) similar to the one believed to have been used to kill Thompson? At McDonald's. If you're doing all this other subterfuge stuff but you're still carrying the murder weapon around & an incriminating manifesto with you when you go to buy a burger ...

That strains credibility. There might be a plausible explanation, but i haven't heard it yet.

Even if it was not a prosthetic mask, which we can't rule out completely yet, the whole performance plays like a game-generated prosthetic-reality-projection. It kinda smacks of it.

As Dan raised, your mind turns to what is the next fucking invasion of privacy that such events are meant to justify.

It does seem slightly strange that it was a worker at McDonald's who caught him, not the FBI. Good job identifying him from the pics. It was reported that he was wearing a Covid-mask when he was id-ed - so it may have been the thing that gave him away. Pretty dumb going out to McDonald's - maybe he wanted to get caught all along.

Ironically, given his anti-corporate stance, he's a princeling from a family corporate empire.

With all the murdering in the world, it's kinda remarkable how little of it is done in the name of some moral anti-corporate agenda (misguided or otherwise). The UNA Bomber, as you mentioned, was one example. There was a recent case of a guy shooting a shonky judge dead - though the judge was not a corporation representative & he had been potentially fucking his daughter, which makes it a more a crime of passion. Apart from that, i can't think of many cases. Don't know of any where a CEO has been targeted.

What remains to be seen, & you almost get the feeling that the game is willing it to happen, is will there be a copycat CEO Killing?

In my mind i questioned why bother wear a mask all the time if you're wearing a prosthetic?, but the answer to that is simple: you'd wear it hide the prosthetic

Right, and note that he's not showing his whole head, just face, and only once. It almost had to be deliberate.

The other thing is they haven't caught him yet. Or gotten any leads/sightings. You've got all the surveillance tech, we gave that up in 9/11 & Covid - but the FBI's computer might hasn't tracked the face down from their database? Mask would explain that.

And remember the discarded cup or water bottle, backpack, staying at the hostel... they'd certainly be able to get DNA somehow.

I mean if you really, really want to go foil hat, he could plant DNA, maybe multiple DNAs.

The whole thing has theatre written all over it. Sociologically, it's significant how much resonance it struck with the public. But like the prosthetic face, it seems too perfectly scripted. The Joker movie come to life. Which makes me wonder if it's not a game-simulation projection onto Plato's proverbial cave wall.

It does indeed. It's a little reminiscent of the Unabomber. Regardless, it has struck such a chord with the public that the FBI must be wondering how to handle this. How are they going to make this person out to be a monster when they killed someone who just about everyone feels represents everything that is evil about the American health care system? They're going to have to find some way, if they find the person, to assassinate their character. Raising questions of them being involved in child pornography, for example, would immediately damper any public enthusiasm for support, even if they never prove it. Just raising the question would do it.

Ironically, it may also have consequences for Covid mask wearing. Could it go from compulsory to banned ? In both instances the reasoning will be to keep us safe. Which seems to be the reason for everything.

I've wondered about this. He got on a bus to New York, wearing a mask, and providing no ID. Are they now going to require IDs to board long haul busses? It will certainly tighten the noose of surveillance in some way.

Below is an example of a realistic face mask.

Now that looks convincing!

I'm wondering if he's wearing a disguise - false nose, teeth, etc., and showing his face in that picture on purpose. That may be crediting him (or her) with more criminal savvy than they have, but it's possible and it would make sense.

It would involve giving them (have to be more than one, apart from the gender) a lotta credit, as you say. You'd have to be playing on a very high (movie-style) level.

That image, which we have no way of verifying, was projected onto our devices. The accompanying storyline: it represents him/her dropping the Covid-mask to flirt with the female receptionist at the hostel. Apart from that one slip, he was assiduously wearing it for days. If you've gone to all that trouble, then you'll know for sure that there's CCTV at the reception. Which leans towards deliberate.

It could be deliberate as in they wanted to show-off, take-a-bow, but that doesn't make a lotta sense in relation to the other actions committed to avoid surveillance.

In my mind i questioned why bother wear a mask all the time if you're wearing a prosthetic?, but the answer to that is simple: you'd wear it hide the prosthetic

The face does look almost too perfect and it has exaggerated features - large nose, cheeks, and chin. Any disguise is going to make things slightly bigger, right?

Right, the jaw looks like Michael Jackson's post-op. I'd put that down to an AI rendering, but an actual Mission Impossible style mask, as you say, it makes sense.

I don't know how easy it is to get a realistic human mask these days - ok, i searched, pretty easy - but you'd be limited in the range. To get a bespoke one done you'd need connections.

The other thing is they haven't caught him yet. Or gotten any leads/sightings. You've got all the surveillance tech, we gave that up in 9/11 & Covid - but the FBI's computer might hasn't tracked the face down from their database? Mask would explain that.

The big story here seems to be how overwhelmingly positive and supportive of the killer social media has been, even among doctors and other health care professionals. Most aren't coming right out and saying, "Well done!", but they're coming pretty close.

Right, that is the thing. Gotta be disturbing for the unaccountable higher-ups in establishment industries - the ones with dirty laundry. There are a few of them: Big-Health, Law/Insurance, deep-state Bureaucracy. You're not gonna want this inspiring copycat killings.

The whole thing has theatre written all over it. Sociologically, it's significant how much resonance it struck with the public. But like the prosthetic face, it seems too perfectly scripted. The Joker movie come to life. Which makes me wonder if it's not a game-simulation projection onto Plato's proverbial cave wall.

Ironically, it may also have consequences for Covid mask wearing. Could it go from compulsory to banned ? In both instances the reasoning will be to keep us safe. Which seems to be the reason for everything.

Below is an example of a realistic face mask.

If they ever do find him or her via DNA or something else, they can always say, "Hey, clearly that's not me in the picture!"

The face does look almost too perfect and it has exaggerated features - large nose, cheeks, and chin. Any disguise is going to make things slightly bigger, right?

The big story here seems to be how overwhelmingly positive and supportive of the killer social media has been, even among doctors and other health care professionals. Most aren't coming right out and saying, "Well done!", but they're coming pretty close.

The inscriptions loosely echo the book title Delay, Deny, Defend, which describes tactics allegedly used by insurers to deny claims. Law enforcement officials may look at whether it suggests a potential motive – anger against health insurers.

UnitedHealth was among a group of companies slammed in a Senate report earlier this year for using automated tools to increase claim denials.

Just coming at the murder from a cyber-tracking perspective, it's like in the old spy movies, where they'd say, Can you enhance that? Back then they couldn't do much more than zoom in, which weakens the pixel quality. But now we have AI, you really can do it. We've gone a long way from grainy CCTV to either full-clarity CCTV, or, AI assisted rendering that can recreate a very good look alike. The irony whereby the murderer may have been motivated by United Health's abuse of automated tools (AI), which is now being used to identify him is very movie-style.