It's amazing how many academics and health professionals have been screaming from the rooftops about the dangers and unknowns of this technology for years, but in the end of course it's the corporations and politicians who will decide, and the media will do it's part to silence any dissent.

I'd say 'some academics and health professionals'. I've seen plenty of name-calling by this group re 5G tinfoil hatters etc to brand Covid conspiracy theorists.

I don't know anything about 5G - i do know that there are a lot of experts who are full of shit and will say whatever to protect vested interests.

It's good you are starting a file on it so we can keep track of what's what.

This article tells of how big govt. is steamrolling these cells into our lives:
Spaced approximately every 10-20 homes, cell antennas will hang in one or more clusters on utility or light poles. Equipment cabinets the size of refrigerators, with cooling fans and back-up generators, will sit on sidewalks. Towers will be located in the public right of way a few feet from bedroom windows, offices, schools, hospitals and nursing homes.

You'll start seeing more and more of these everywhere:

Here's a list of articles tagged with 5G in our bookmarks.

It's amazing how many academics and health professionals have been screaming from the rooftops about the dangers and unknowns of this technology for years, but in the end of course it's the corporations and politicians who will decide, and the media will do it's part to silence any dissent.

We have controlled studies where they take two test tubes of sperm from a healthy man. One they don't expose to cell phone radiation, the other gets exposed. The exposed test tube, those sperm will die three times faster with three times more damage to their DNA," she said. "That has been replicated in many studies, so we know that this is a fact, and yet when the bodies that advise the government are asked for their advice, they say, 'We don't have enough evidence.

If you look carefully at the membership of those bodies and the revolving door between the industry and those who regulate it, you can see that there really hasn't been a full, independent evaluation, which is why we at Environmental Health Trust are calling for an independent evaluation of the science, and the FCC has utterly failed to look.

Sounds awfully familiar to the kind of 'no evidence' science we are seeing practiced with Covid and vaccines - where 'no evidence' is code for 'we know - but we don't want to know - we especially don't you to know.'