<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Formosahut forum - Formation of Tectonic Plates</title>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/</link>
<description>Living in Taiwan</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Formation of Tectonic Plates</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was wondering if the tectonic plates were always where they are now and how did they form. Could a new plate form in an area previously not known for seismic activity?</p>
<p>Turns out their formation is an &quot;enduring puzzle in geology&quot;.</p>
<p>Seems the best guess is that subduction created weaknesses in the earth&#039;s crust in particular places that over time became the boundaries of the plates around 3-4 billion years ago.</p>
<p>This article in the <a href="evidence of subduction gathered from minerals preserved in ancient rocks. The oldest such specimens are 4-billion-year-old zircons found in the Jack Hills of Australia">Huffpost</a> seems to suggest that where they are now is where they always were - just where the chips fell in the process of the earth settling into its skin - though it does mention: &quot;The oldest ... evidence of subduction gathered from minerals preserved in ancient rocks... are 4-billion-year-old zircons found in the Jack Hills of Australia.&quot;  Given Australia is not on a plate boundary, then maybe they may have moved - or could still form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1914</link>
<guid>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1914</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dulan drift</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
