<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Formosahut forum - Hysteresis</title>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/</link>
<description>Living in Taiwan</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Hysteresis (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s interesting - is it named coz there will be hysteria once we hit that point?</p>
<p>One thing i don&#039;t understand is how the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere  is spread around the world.</p>
<p>Intuitively, i assume it&#039;s higher in places like China? Then thins out from there?</p>
<p>And how does it translate in terms of localised effects where concentration is higher - or doesn&#039;t it work like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1593</link>
<guid>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1593</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 06:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dulan drift</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hysteresis (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related story <a href="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190220-how-artificially-brightened-clouds-could-stop-climate-change">http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190220-how-artificially-brightened-clouds-could-stop-...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1591</link>
<guid>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1591</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hysteresis</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#039;Hysteresis&#039; seems to be the word we were looking for, a fancy way of saying tipping point.</p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/02/striking-study-finds-a-climate-tipping-point-in-clouds/">https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/02/striking-study-finds-a-climate-tipping-point-in...</a></p>
<p>&quot;A new study led by Caltech&#039;s Tapio Schneider may have identified a disturbing hysteresis in Earth&#039;s climate—a shift in cloud patterns in response to warming that could quickly heat the planet much further.&quot;</p>
<p>---</p>
<p>&quot;Up to about 1,000 parts per million, there were no major surprises. Things got around 4°C warmer and numbers changed for things like water vapor and cloud altitude. But the cloud deck generally looked familiar.</p>
<p>At about 1,200 parts per million, however, the simulated clouds suddenly dissipated. And without that shade reflecting sunlight, <strong>the world warmed another 8°C.</strong>&quot;</p>
<p>One question that this raises is, what might cause the CO2 to rise to 1,200ppm? According to the article, it&#039;s now at 400ppm:</p>
<p>&quot;Are we doomed to see this play out soon? There&#039;s a good case to be made for, if not optimism, at least holding off on pessimism. It would take around a century of continued emissions growth to hit the equivalent of 1,200 parts per million CO2. Even the emissions-reduction pledges that have already been made can prevent that.&quot;</p>
<p>The article goes on to basically raise more questions than it answers, but that&#039;s worrying, really. Basically it&#039;s saying that there are all sorts of events that have happened in the distant past, are happening now, and could happen theoretically, none of which we really understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1589</link>
<guid>https://formosahut.com/forum/index.php?id=1589</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
