Vaccine Data War 2022 - Danish Om Study (General)

by dulan drift, Tuesday, January 04, 2022, 11:45 (14 days ago)

Continued from Vaccine Data War 2021

Omicron Study: Our findings confirm that the rapid spread of the Omicron VOC primarily can be ascribed to the immune evasiveness rather than an inherent increase in the basic transmissibility.

This confirms what everyone already knew - the vaccines don't work against Omicron. Yet saying that can get you banned from social media! We are officially living in a false reality. It's not the flat-earth society exactly - it's like knowing the earth is round but forcing everyone to say it's flat - so we can sell a special medicine that will prevent you from falling off the edge.

Pandemic of the Unvaccinated

by dulan drift, Wednesday, January 05, 2022, 06:16 (14 days ago) @ dulan drift

Biden: This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Not the vaccinated, the unvaccinated. That’s the problem. Everybody talks about freedom about not to have a shot or have a test. Well guess what? How about patriotism? How about you make sure you’re vaccinated, so you do not spread the disease to anyone else.

Biden, as ever, was following the advice of the health experts, led by Fauci who told us:
Vaccines prevent getting infected, prevent getting sick, prevent your hospitalization.

I'm not sure what it's like in the US but it's not a pandemic of the unvaccinated in Australia - in fact it's the opposite. 95% double-vaxxed - infections pushing 50k per day.

Pandemic of the Unvaccinated

by dan @, Wednesday, January 05, 2022, 06:21 (14 days ago) @ dulan drift

I'm not sure what it's like in the US but it's not a pandemic of the unvaccinated in Australia - in fact it's the opposite. 95% vaxxed - infections through the roof.

I'm not sure what it's like in the US either, but with regards to patriotism, there's nothing more patriotic than standing up for one's constitutional rights.

Natural Immunity

by dulan drift, Saturday, January 08, 2022, 06:54 (11 days ago) @ dan

Here's a good one for the crazy file.

Study after study shows natural infection provides long-lasting immunity - induc(ing) a robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune memory in humans.

Not only is it as good as double/triple/quadruple vaxxed - it's better.

A study in Austria reported the hospitalisation rate due to a repeat infection at 0.03 per cent.

Data from other studies put the reinfection rate at 0%!

But in many countries it's still not recognized as a reason for not getting vaccinated.

Dr. Lindsay Weaver, CEO Indiana Dept Health: Don’t rely on natural immunity to protect you. Even if you had a mild case the first time, your symptoms could be more severe the second time if you are not vaccinated and boosted.

Total rubbish - contrary to all evidence. Lies basically. Now here's the real crazy bit. A recent study found that:

previous COVID-19 was associated with increased adverse events following vaccination with the Comirnaty BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech)

So, going against the scientific data to force naturally infected people to get vaccinated is (a)providing zero additional protection, and (b)putting the vaxee's health at risk - for no reason - except to accommodate the health authorities' desire to exercise their tyrannical urges.

Novak Djokovic, who has recovered from a previous infection, has recently brought this into focus. Despite being given a visa to enter Australia, he was detained at the airport. He's now being held in a quarantine facility.

Meanwhile the rabid mob have been whipped-up in Australia to vilify the poor guy. Even if he does win an exemption to play he'll be walking into a cauldron of vile abuse. In fact i wonder if the health experts will arm the fans with vax-loaded syringes to throw at him while he plays - or maybe those South American poison-dart-type tubes would be better. Let's see how one of the greatest of all time goes when he's a walking pin cushion of covid-jabs.

Speaking of the rabid mob - this video from Melbourne captures a glimpse into the mindset that has taken hold in Australia. Some idiot, outraged by a (wrongly) perceived invasion of his social distancing space by a jogger, launches a brutal assault. So much opprobrium has been constantly fanned by the health authorities against the so-called non-compliant that it's no surprise police and even civilians are answering the call with violence.

https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2022/01/07/5174537170846827000/1024x576_MP4_51...

Moderna calls for 4th shot

by dulan drift, Monday, January 10, 2022, 06:01 (9 days ago) @ dulan drift

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, at a Goldman Sachs-organized healthcare conference: I still believe we’re going to need boosters in the fall of ’22 and forward.

And forward. So an endless stream of boosters, in fact. He cites an Israeli study that shows a 5-fold increase in antibodies after a 4th shot. (Btw, what's Goldman-Sachs got to do with running world-health?)

For a start, an increase in antibodies doesn't necessarily co-relate to vaccine efficiency in the real world - only means it causes an immune response reaction in the body - which may not be effective against the current Omicron strain. In fact, the information i've seen says it's not.

Finally, even some health experts have caught up to Formosahut and are starting to question the wisdom of having for-profit pharmaceutical companies dictating our entire Covid response.

Andrew Pollard: We can’t vaccinate the planet every four to six months. It’s not sustainable or affordable.

Monica Gandhi: It trains your immune system wrong. It doesn't train your immune system to recognize a variant. It trains your immune system to recognize the old ancestral strain that the shots are made of. That concept is the 'original antigenic sin,' is what they call it.

Moderna calls for 4th shot

by dan @, Tuesday, January 11, 2022, 18:25 (7 days ago) @ dulan drift

Could This COVID Anti-Viral Pill Fuel the Emergence of New Variants?

This is an incredible exploration of an incredible fuck up of a Big Pharma and the US FDA, and it's in a very main stream publication. The article speaks for itself. The opening paragraph:

Some scientists have expressed concerns that an anti-viral COVID-19 drug that is being rolled out across the United States may help to fuel the emergence of dangerous new variants.

Bam! There it is. Full stop. But it's not a full stop, is it. They're still going to sell this shit and make the US taxpayer foot the bill for this drug that may very well give rise to a very deadly variant. It's incredible, and it's here in black and white. Who's minding the store? Who is protecting us?

Initially hailed as a potential game-changer because it can be taken at home, the drug has been shown to cut the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 by 30 percent in these patients—a lower efficacy than Merck had originally claimed.

30%. That's probably less than gargling with saline.

Alongside the downgraded efficacy figures, some concerns have been raised about the drug's safety and the possibly that it might alter human genes.

Nothing to see here folks. Keep moving.

...experts have raised concerns about the possibility that the use of the drug could fuel the emergence of new COVID-19 variants, like Delta or Omicron, that are highly transmissible and/or may evade protection afforded by the vaccines to some extent.

A small price to pay for the enormous profits to be had by Merck.

"I am very concerned about the potential consequences now that molnupiravir has been approved," Michael Lin, an associate Professor of neurobiology and bioengineering at Stanford University, told Newsweek. "It would only be a matter of time, perhaps a very short time, before a lucky set of mutations occurs to create a variant that is more transmissible or immunoevasive."

Thank you, Michael, for your honesty and integrity. I'd be getting your resume in order if I were you. Do you still remember how to wait tables?

We're fucked. We're truly fucked. The fact that they'd let a drug like this on the market... I'm speechless. And their hold on public opinion is so strong that they don't even try to hide it.

Tags:
Treatments fueling new variants

Covid pill

by dulan drift, Wednesday, January 12, 2022, 10:23 (7 days ago) @ dan

Great post.

From the beginning of Covid we were posting material that can only be classified as 'lying - with deadly dangerous consequences'. We kept thinking - 'they'll never get away with this' - but here we are, two years later, 5 mil dead, our freedoms evaporated - but not a single person has been held accountable for any of it.

Pfizer admits 2-doses is useless

by dulan drift, Wednesday, January 12, 2022, 10:37 (7 days ago) @ dulan drift

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO: We know that the two doses of the vaccine offer very limited protection, if any.

We can safely read zero protection there. We already knew that but it's stunning to see Pfizer admit it's vaccine doesn't work while at the same time governments are punishing people for not taking it - even though they have exactly the same level of protection as double-vaxxed. Unvaxxed can still not travel interstate in Australia, or overseas, or work at most jobs. That's pure bastardry for the sake of bastardry.

The three doses with a booster, they offer reasonable protection against hospitalisation and deaths – against deaths, I think, very good, and less protection against infection.

Do they? Omicron is milder anyway in terms of deaths. And for how long?

Now we are working on a new version of our vaccine, the 1.1, let me put it that way, that will cover Omicron as well. Of course we are waiting to have the final results, [but] the vaccine will be ready in March.

Great. So a new vaccine rushed onto the market that may or may not work for five minutes.

The hope is that we will achieve something that will have way, way better protection particularly against infections.

The hope is we will continue to make billions from the forced vaccination of the planet and we don't give a shit if it works. A well-founded hope i'd say given the complicity of authoritarian governments.

Omicron makes vaccines obselete

by dulan drift, Wednesday, January 12, 2022, 12:22 (6 days ago) @ dulan drift

Luc Montagnier (Nobel prize winner)/Jed Rubenfeld: It would be irrational, legally indefensible and contrary to the public interest for government to mandate vaccines absent any evidence that the vaccines are effective in stopping the spread of the pathogen they target. Yet that’s exactly what’s happening here.

If mandatory vaccination is considered necessary to interrupt transmission chains and prevent harm to others, there should be sufficient evidence that the vaccine is efficacious in preventing serious infection and/or transmission. There is as yet no such evidence. The little data we have suggests the opposite.

One preprint study found that after 30 days the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines no longer had any statistically significant positive effect against Omicron infection, and after 90 days, their effect went negative – i.e. vaccinated people were more susceptible to Omicron infection.

Confirming this negative efficacy finding, data from Denmark and the Canadian province of Ontario indicate that vaccinated people have higher rates of Omicron infection than unvaccinated people.

That's interesting - i suspected vaccines weren't much use against Omicron - i didn't realize they were worse than useless.

I wonder why that is. Do vaccines 'wear-out' the immune system? It may be that some of the unvaxxed in the study had acquired natural immunity - i'm struggling to think of any other explanation.

Again, this highlights the human perversion in bullying the unvaxxed. The Djokovic case brings it into stark relief. The guy has natural immunity, meaning he is better protected against Covid (and less likely to spread it) than all of the 95+% of Australians who are double-vaxxed and supposedly protected (who are currently spreading Covid at the rate of close to 100 000 cases per day amongst themselves!) - but he gets arrested at the airport and incarcerated in one of Australia's notorious illegal immigrant detention centres.

Medical Experts want Rogan banned

by dulan drift, Saturday, January 15, 2022, 11:08 (4 days ago) @ dulan drift

270 medical experts have started a petition to have Rogan banned.

The petition (co-authored by Jessica Rivera): Spotify has a responsibility to mitigate the spread of misinformation on its platform, though the company presently has no misinformation policy. Mass-misinformation events of this scale have extraordinarily dangerous ramifications.

The hypocrisy is breath-taking. Medical experts have perpetrated the greatest whopper in the history of lying re the origin of Covid and now they have the audacity to claim Rogan, who has helped expose those lies, is extraordinarily dangerous!

Signee Katrine Wallace, epidemiologist, Chicago School of Public Health: Rogan is a menace to public health. Having things like this on the Joe Rogan podcast gives a platform to these people and makes it a false balance. This is what really bothers me.

Again, you've gotta be fucking kidding me. You're talking about balance in the media after you've de-platformed everyone who disagrees with you and now you want to ban the one mainstream person you haven't yet been able to crush.

These are fringe ideas not backed in science, and having it on a huge platform makes it seem there are two sides to this issue. And there are really not. The overwhelming evidence is the vaccine works, and it is safe.

For crying out loud - even Pfizer says two-doses, which was meant to be full-vaxxed, doesn't work - having a very limited effect, if any!

Co-author Ben Rein, neuroscientist Stanford Uni:
People who don’t have the scientific or medical background to recognise the things he’s saying are not true and are unable to distinguish fact from fiction are going to believe what [Malone is] saying, and this is the biggest podcast in the world. And that’s terrifying.

No, what's terrifying is this War on the Truth. If you don't like Rogan then don't listen to him. You can find wall-to-wall pro-vax cheering on every mainstream media platform across the planet. But that's still not enough for you, is it?

As usual, those calling for bans on anyone questioning the Covid cover-up or bio-state regime never talk about details. They invariably say they are pro-THE-science but refuse to engage in discussion of scientific details. It's all name-calling and meaningless generalizations about the need to protect us.

If you disagree with Rogan or anyone, then say why you intellectual chicken-shits. We'll have a discussion about the details - then listeners can make up their minds. But you'll never do that. The last thing on earth you want is focus on details and open debate - coz that leads to truth.

And the truth is medical health experts caused, then covered up the origin of Covid. Then used Covid to introduce a bio-state to entrench their power/money.

Any threats to that must be crushed at all cost.

Medical Experts want Rogan banned

by dan @, Saturday, January 15, 2022, 19:15 (3 days ago) @ dulan drift

If you disagree with Rogan or anyone, then say why you intellectual chicken-shits. We'll have a discussion about the details - then listeners can make up their minds. But you'll never do that. The last thing on earth you want is focus on details and open debate - coz that leads to truth.

This is it. Why don't they debate? Why won't they sit down with other 'experts' like Malone and have an open, in depth, long debate. As you noted, they're just parroting sound bites.

I assume that Rogan's show is popular enough that this attempt will fall flat, but that's not the point. The fact that they're doing it sends a signal to all other podcasters that if they want to make it, there are issues they can't cover. It's censorship regardless of how it affects Rogan's show.

Djokovic Ban

by dulan drift, Monday, January 17, 2022, 06:16 (1 day, 18 hours, 1 min. ago) @ dan

Alex Hawke, Australia's Immigration Minister, has used his power to overturn a judge's decision to allow Djokovic to play in the Australian Open. So much for 'the rule of law'.

So what were his reasons?

Hawke: Mr Djokovic’s presence in Australia may pose a health risk to the Australian community, in that his presence in Australia may foster anti-vaccination sentiment leading to other unvaccinated persons refusing to become vaccinated.

You've already got 95% vaxxed and you've vilified/punished/leperized the remaining 5% - if they haven't submitted to this unprecedented coercion by now, i doubt the presence of a tennis player in Australia is going to make any difference one way or the other.

This is another example of the rise of Australia's fascist Thought Police - His presence in Australia may foster anti-vaccination sentiment - so let's get one step ahead and ban those thoughts/sentiments.

You would think the uncovering of the Covid-orgin cover-up would have some slight chastening effect on those prosecuting the War on Truth. It hasn't. The total lack of accountability for spreading those lies has emboldened authorities to roll straight onto the next issue. The message to the outside world is:

If you care about the truth or the evaporation of basic freedoms, don't come here. We will find you, we will crush you.

It's worth noting that the minister who made the decision is from the conservatives. The other side is pushing for even more draconian measures.

Myocarditis - mRNA Vacs

by dulan drift, Monday, January 17, 2022, 11:04 (1 day, 13 hours, 13 min. ago) @ dulan drift

Firstly, does AZ even exist anymore? (dumped on 3rd world countries doesn't count)

But trying to fathom the actual incidence of myocarditis in the young with mRNA shots.

TGA stats for second dose in teenage boys (it's) at 12 cases per 100,000 for Pfizer and 17 per 100,000 for Moderna

Leaving reports of under-reporting aside for a moment, that's about 15 per 100 000, which is:

1 in 6,666.

But that's per shot. If you look at in terms of your likelihood to have an attack of myocarditis (a very serious illness) then you need to look at it per course of an mRNA vaccine.

We're already up to 4 and counting in Australia and other countries so we can divide 6666 by 4

= 1,666

That's if you trust the pro-vax talking heads' figures. If you think half of the cases are swept under the carpet then you're looking at a risk factor in the 800's.

That's only myocarditis - known effect in the short term. You're still in the running for pericarditis.

Then there's the long term effects - whatever they are.

Myocarditis - mRNA Vacs - New Scientist

by dulan drift, Monday, January 17, 2022, 11:26 (1 day, 12 hours, 51 min. ago) @ dulan drift

New Scientist: Now a study in the US has analysed how often myocarditis occurs following infection with the coronavirus.

Great.

Researchers analysed the records of healthcare organisations that cover a fifth of the US population. They found that, during the first 12 months of the pandemic, males aged 12 to 17 were most likely to develop myocarditis within three months of catching covid-19, at a rate of about 450 cases per million infections.(45 per 100 000)

3 months is a very wide net. With no indication of whether it was caused by Covid or they simply had an attack in that timeframe. Are you using the same 3 month window post the vaccines?

Secondly, if they're in hospital, they're severe cases of Covid - so the figures don't include the percentage of mild or asymptomatic cases, thus skewing them significantly.

Thirdly, Omicron is known to be relatively mild - but the potency of the vaccine hasn't changed - it gets progressively higher in fact.

RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum